Skip to main content

Mixed message on a bottle: Will the proposed wine warning label endanger “the soul of France?”


France’s health minister Agnès “buzzkill” Buzyn  has again provoked the ire of the wine industry with a new proposal to require a large red warning label on all bottles, admonishing pregnant women to avoid all alcohol and reminding buyers of the legal age limit (18) for drinking. A coalition of 64 of France’s top winemakers are pushing back, declaring in a letter to Le Figaro that this is nothing less than an affront to the soul of their country. As translated by British newspaper The Telegraph, the letter implores their countrymen to recognize the importance of the “thousands of tourists [who] come to discover this France, bosom of the art de vivre that is the envy of the world and where wine plays a leading role.” They mourn the prospect of bottles defaced “with labels covered in lugubrious and deathly signs.” Warning labels are already required in France as in many other countries, but the size is not specified; Buzyn want a 2 cm (about an inch) wide red banner. I cringe at the thought.
   Whether the labels will be of any benefit to public health is the overriding question. Buzyn’s rationale is her claim that wine is like any other form of alcohol from a health perspective, and the fact that a quarter of pregnant women continue to drink. On the first point, she is wrong, and I have detailed the evidence here before. The second point is obviously a sensitive one; no one in their right mind would encourage women to drink while pregnant. But having said that, Dr. Buzyn hasn’t presented evidence that France has a disproportionate problem with alcohol abuse during pregnancy, or that it is in the form of wine. In general, wine drinkers have healthier drinking habits, and indications are that alcohol abusers are unlikely to take notice of the labels anyway.
   The use of warning labels has its roots in tobacco packaging. But speaking for the French wine industry, Pierre-Henri Gaget of Maison Louis Jadot, has said “We don’t carry the plague and don’t want to be tarred with the same brush as cigarette manufacturers.” Those in Buzyn’s camp, like her British counterpart Sally Davies, see no benefit of moderate drinking and thereby equate wine to smoking. But even if that were true, do warning labels affect consumer behavior? It’s surprisingly hard to prove. Most of the research tracks short term responses to the labels, with focus groups, eye tracking, and surveys. A recent study[i] from University of Liverpool and the UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, evaluating enhanced labels like the ones proposed in France, concluded “Alcohol consumers allocate minimal attention to warning labels on alcohol packaging and even if their attention is directed to these warning labels, this has no impact on their drinking intentions.” This mirrored the findings of an earlier Australian study[ii] that looked at the effect of warning labels on adolescents, which concluded that while the introduction of alcohol warning labels increased initial awareness, “little change was observed in terms of beliefs about the risks of alcohol use or participation in risky alcohol-related behaviours. These findings are similar to those reported among adult samples.” A study on university students in Italy[iii] identified a key aspect of the issue, noting that “Italian young adults with moderate consumption behaviour view label warnings positively, while this attitude is weaker among younger adults and those with riskier consumption behaviours.” So by inference, teenagers and pregnant   women – the target audience for the warning labels – will be least influenced if at all.
   We can only conclude that this latest salvo is at the very least misinformed, certainly misguided, and will probably do more harm than good.


[i] Kersbergen I, Field M. Alcohol consumers' attention to warning labels and brand information on alcohol packaging: Findings from cross-sectional and experimental studies. BMC Public Health. 2017 Jan 26;17(1):123.
[ii] Scholes-Balog KE, Heerde JA, Hemphill SA. Alcohol warning labels: unlikely to affect alcohol-related beliefs and behaviours in adolescents. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2012 Dec;36(6):524-9.
[iii] Annunziata A, Vecchio R, Mariani A. Alcohol Warnings and Moderate Drinking Patterns among Italian University Students: An Exploratory Study. Nutrients. 2017 Jun 17;9(6).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Revisiting resveratrol: new findings rekindle anti-aging debate

Just when we thought the bloom was off the rosé for resveratrol, the anti-oxidant polyphenol from red wine with multiple anti-aging properties, along comes new research giving life to the debate. But first a bit of background: As I detailed in my book Age Gets Better with Wine , it is well-documented that wine drinkers live longer and have lower rates of many diseases of aging. Much or the credit for this has been given to resveratrol, though there isn’t nearly enough of it in wine to explain the effects. Nevertheless, I dubbed it the “miracle molecule” and when it was reported to activate a unique life-extension phenomenon via a genetic trigger called SIRT, an industry was born, led by Sirtris Pharmaceuticals, quickly acquired by pharma giant Glaxo. The hope was that resveratrol science could lead to compounds enabling people to live up to 150 years and with a good quality of life. But alas, researchers from other labs could not duplicate the results, and clinical studies disa

Which came first: Beer or wine? (or something else?)

Actually neither beer nor wine was the first fermented beverage, and wine arguably has a closer connection to health, but recent evidence indicates that humans developed the ability to metabolize alcohol long before we were even human. The uniquely human ability to handle alcohol comes from the digestive enzyme alcohol dehydrogenase, or ADH4. A new science called paleogenetics identifies the emergence of the modern version of the ADH4 gene in our ape ancestors some 10 million years ago. Interestingly, this corresponds to the time when our arboreal forebears transitioned to a nomadic lifestyle on the ground. We went from swinging from tree limbs to walking upright, and the rest is history. Understanding the circumstances that led to perpetuation of the ADH4 mutation may contain clues to what made us human in the first place. How the ability to metabolize alcohol made us human Paleogenetecist Matthew Carrigan has an idea about how this happened . Arboreal species rely on fruit tha