It has become common to think of the antioxidant molecule resveratrol
as the main beneficial ingredient in wine, but a new study sheds light on how
resveratrol without the other components of wine might actually be a bad thing.
Sure, resveratrol is a miracle molecule, providing a plausible explanation for
many of the health benefits of moderate drinking: lower odds of diabetes,
cancer, osteoporosis, even longer life by activation of longevity genes. I
leaned heavily on these findings in the book. But what I didn’t anticipate was
that resveratrol would become such a hugely popular supplement, and in many people’s
minds it became a proxy for wine. If a study showed some failing of resveratrol
in a laboratory study, it was put out as a denunciation of healthy drinking. Or
when it showed some positive effect in mice, it was hailed as proof that
resveratrol had all the benefits of wine – without the alcohol. Both are
oversimplifications.
Resveratrol works best when combined with other wine antioxidants
Whole wine better than resveratrol alone
The authors of this study concluded that resveratrol requires wine-derived polyphenols for
optimum antioxidant efficiency, which implies that whole wine is a better
choice than resveratrol supplements alone. The antioxidant properties of
resveratrol are of course only a limited part of their repertoire, but given a
choice I’ll go with the science on this one. To your health!
Comments
Post a Comment