Skip to main content

Is de-alcoholized wine better for health?


Over the past few weeks there has been a flurry of news coverage over a clinical study finding that de-alcoholized red wine lowered blood pressure, but not whole wine. The usual interpretation was that wine without the alcohol was probably a better choice for health, with the blood pressure drop projected to equate to about a 14% decrease in heart disease risk. Supplement makers proclaimed that their wine-derived resveratrol pills were therefore a smarter choice, others concluded that grape juice would do the trick. But other studies out on alcohol found unique benefits, and as you have seen here before a broader view is needed in order to see the picture clearly.

As with most studies, the blood pressure experiment had problems. For one, there was no “control” group for comparison. But the bigger question always is whether these findings translate into anything meaningful in terms of overall health and longevity. It is not reasonable to assume that a single parameter such as blood pressure tells the whole story with heart health and drinking, even less so when considering the range of healthful effects of moderate wine consumption. What it does do is confirm that the non-alcohol components of wine, taken as a whole, have independent positive effects.

So what of the alcohol? Consider a recent study on the effects of moderate drinking on bone density (a measure of osteoporosis).  Using a cohort of 300 women with an average age of 67, a consistent correlation of alcohol intake and better bone density was found. These finding are in line with previous studies. Another study found lowered rates of rheumatoid arthritis among moderate drinkers. (In my book Age Gets Better with Wine I cite findings from a lab study showing how this might work.) The researchers concluded that this was one of “multiple studies that have shown that alcohol can have a beneficial effect on risk for rheumatoid arthritis.”

So even if alcohol does not contribute directly to heart health, there are other areas where it appears to provide benefit. Heavy consumption is well-known to increase blood pressure, but in moderation as in the study cited above it seemed to be benign. As with all studies occupying the media spotlight for their 15 minutes of fame, nothing here is as bad (or in other cases as good) as it sounds. I am reminded of Michael Pollan’s book on healthy eating called In Defense of Food, subtitled “Eat food, mostly vegetables, not too much.” The same could apply for wine: Drink wine, mostly red, not too much (and I would add not too little.) And by the way, grape juice is not just wine without the alcohol; it has a lot of sugar and lower levels of antioxidant polyphenols.

Comments

  1. I was looking for interesting blogs about wine and came accross yours. I wanted to leave you a comment to let you know I'm reading (and enjoying!).

    Polyphenols are so important and wine is a great way to recieve them. Of course, everything in moderation! Grape juice is definetly not the same.

    -- Kristy @ Wine Logic

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Which came first: Beer or wine? (or something else?)

Actually neither beer nor wine was the first fermented beverage, and wine arguably has a closer connection to health, but recent evidence indicates that humans developed the ability to metabolize alcohol long before we were even human. The uniquely human ability to handle alcohol comes from the digestive enzyme alcohol dehydrogenase, or ADH4. A new science called paleogenetics identifies the emergence of the modern version of the ADH4 gene in our ape ancestors some 10 million years ago. Interestingly, this corresponds to the time when our arboreal forebears transitioned to a nomadic lifestyle on the ground. We went from swinging from tree limbs to walking upright, and the rest is history. Understanding the circumstances that led to perpetuation of the ADH4 mutation may contain clues to what made us human in the first place. How the ability to metabolize alcohol made us human Paleogenetecist Matthew Carrigan has an idea about how this happened . Arboreal species rely on fruit tha

Why I am not surprised that the NIH cancelled the alcohol-health study

Not long after enrolling the first patients in the much hyped prospective study on alcohol and health, the National Institutes of Health recently announced that they were pulling the plug. I am actually more surprised that they ever got it off the ground in the first place. As I wrote a year ago when the study was still in its planning stages, there were too many competing interests, criticisms of the study design, and concerns about funding to expect that whatever results came out would be universally accepted. Nevertheless, I am disappointed. The study, called Moderate Alcohol and Cardiovascular Health Trial (MACH) was intended to provide hard evidence about the health effects of moderate alcohol consumption by prospectively assigning subjects with heart disease to one drink per day or not drinking, which they were to follow for up to 10 years. Most existing data on the question is retrospective, or simply tracks a subject population according to their drinking preferences, w