Skip to main content

Hope for wine allergy sufferers

It seems at every talk I give on wine’s contribution to healthy living, there is at least one person in the audience who asks about wine allergies. Maybe they can’t drink red (thereby missing out on a lot of the antioxidant polyphenols), or maybe not wine at all. Sulfites are often blamed, but they are naturally present in all wines, beyond what is commonly added for preservation, and actual sulfite allergies are comparatively rare. What’s more, sulfites are higher in white wine, while allergic reactions are more common to reds. The question of why so many people have reactions to wine has remained largely unanswered until now.


A study from the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern Denmark, and the Agricultural Research Council, Research Unit for Table Grapes and Wine Growing in Turi, Italy has identified a class of molecules called glycoproteins as the culprit. These are ubiquitous biological compounds that are comprised of a sugar portion (glyco-) attached to a protein. Examples include several hormones, connective tissue structures, and even antibodies. These molecules are commonly ensconced in the cell membrane, where they may help to identify what type of cell they are part of. Immune surveillance can be very tuned in to these molecules and so they are fairly common allergens. The Danish-Italian study identified some 28 different glycoproteins in wine with similarities to known plant allergens.

Unfortunately, glycoproteins in wine are derived from the grapes themselves as well as the yeast required for fermentation. It is possible that different strains of yeast might explain the differences in reactions to different wines (for example, people who are able to drink European wines but not the same varietal from a domestic producer), but using different yeasts would change the character of the wine. But this isn’t to say that nothing can be done. Hopefully some clever winemaker will target the market segment of those who would like to drink wine but can’t, and figure out some fining method or other means to remove glycoproteins from wine without sacrificing character. Clearly there is a lot more to learn about glycoproteins and wine allergy, but at least we now have something to go on.

Palmisano G, Antonacci D, Larsen MR. Glycoproteinomic profile in wine: A sweet molecular renaissance. J Protenome Res 2010 Oct 1; [epub ahead of print]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Which came first: Beer or wine? (or something else?)

Actually neither beer nor wine was the first fermented beverage, and wine arguably has a closer connection to health, but recent evidence indicates that humans developed the ability to metabolize alcohol long before we were even human. The uniquely human ability to handle alcohol comes from the digestive enzyme alcohol dehydrogenase, or ADH4. A new science called paleogenetics identifies the emergence of the modern version of the ADH4 gene in our ape ancestors some 10 million years ago. Interestingly, this corresponds to the time when our arboreal forebears transitioned to a nomadic lifestyle on the ground. We went from swinging from tree limbs to walking upright, and the rest is history. Understanding the circumstances that led to perpetuation of the ADH4 mutation may contain clues to what made us human in the first place. How the ability to metabolize alcohol made us human Paleogenetecist Matthew Carrigan has an idea about how this happened . Arboreal species rely on fruit tha

Why I am not surprised that the NIH cancelled the alcohol-health study

Not long after enrolling the first patients in the much hyped prospective study on alcohol and health, the National Institutes of Health recently announced that they were pulling the plug. I am actually more surprised that they ever got it off the ground in the first place. As I wrote a year ago when the study was still in its planning stages, there were too many competing interests, criticisms of the study design, and concerns about funding to expect that whatever results came out would be universally accepted. Nevertheless, I am disappointed. The study, called Moderate Alcohol and Cardiovascular Health Trial (MACH) was intended to provide hard evidence about the health effects of moderate alcohol consumption by prospectively assigning subjects with heart disease to one drink per day or not drinking, which they were to follow for up to 10 years. Most existing data on the question is retrospective, or simply tracks a subject population according to their drinking preferences, w