Skip to main content

Is organic wine a healthier choice?

Many people accept as gospel that organic food (and wine is a food) is healthier. No chemicals, harmful pesticides, or hormones must mean more nutritional value, right? Maybe, but there is a surprising lack of evidence in the form of dietary intervention studies –that is, actual measures of health parameters comparing organic and regular diets. That isn’t to say that there aren’t any, and recent studies are helping to shed some light on the subject.


Beyond the questions of environmental stewardship and moral/ethical reasons to eat organic, it is important to identify what sorts of nutrients that organic foods might contain in greater abundance and how this translates into better health. Vitamins aren’t the answer; simple enough to take a multivitamin pill and get what you need. A more promising possibility is antioxidants, nutrients such as the polyphenols that make red wine red and in general seem to be more prevalent in brightly colored foods. Antioxidants come in a variety of types, but in general they act as part of self-defense systems against spoilage and a number of environmental challenges. A well-know example is resveratrol from wine; this pluripotent polyphenol is an antiviral, antifungal, all-around good guy that seems to have a wide range of anti-aging properties. And because plants make these in response to environmental stress, they should make more of them when not pampered with sprays, fertilizers, and all manner of unnatural things, they should be more nutritious when left to fend for themselves. (A related concept is “biodynamic” farming.)

So a diet higher in antioxidants is a good thing. The science, however, is a bit trickier, since there are various ways of measuring antioxidant potency, and what works in the lab may not in the diet. Among the various ways to measure antioxidant potency is the ORAC test (Oxygen Radical Absoption Capacity), and it is possible to measure a sort of whole body ORAC with what is called “human plasma total antioxidant capacity.” The aforementioned study started by determining the ORAC levels of organic vs. traditionally farmed foods, including wine, and the scores were higher for the organic foods (with a few exceptions.) In test subjects converted to an organic Mediterranean diet, an increase of 21% in total body antioxidant capacity was seen after 14 days.

Does this mean your wines (and other foods) should be organic? You could make a case for it, but there are plenty of non-organically grown wines that pack a healthy punch. Winemakers already intentionally stress the vines in specific ways because more polyphenols also means more flavorful and distinctive wines. It is just fortunate that good wines tend to be good for you too.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Revisiting resveratrol: new findings rekindle anti-aging debate

Just when we thought the bloom was off the rosé for resveratrol, the anti-oxidant polyphenol from red wine with multiple anti-aging properties, along comes new research giving life to the debate. But first a bit of background: As I detailed in my book Age Gets Better with Wine , it is well-documented that wine drinkers live longer and have lower rates of many diseases of aging. Much or the credit for this has been given to resveratrol, though there isn’t nearly enough of it in wine to explain the effects. Nevertheless, I dubbed it the “miracle molecule” and when it was reported to activate a unique life-extension phenomenon via a genetic trigger called SIRT, an industry was born, led by Sirtris Pharmaceuticals, quickly acquired by pharma giant Glaxo. The hope was that resveratrol science could lead to compounds enabling people to live up to 150 years and with a good quality of life. But alas, researchers from other labs could not duplicate the results, and clinical studies disa

Which came first: Beer or wine? (or something else?)

Actually neither beer nor wine was the first fermented beverage, and wine arguably has a closer connection to health, but recent evidence indicates that humans developed the ability to metabolize alcohol long before we were even human. The uniquely human ability to handle alcohol comes from the digestive enzyme alcohol dehydrogenase, or ADH4. A new science called paleogenetics identifies the emergence of the modern version of the ADH4 gene in our ape ancestors some 10 million years ago. Interestingly, this corresponds to the time when our arboreal forebears transitioned to a nomadic lifestyle on the ground. We went from swinging from tree limbs to walking upright, and the rest is history. Understanding the circumstances that led to perpetuation of the ADH4 mutation may contain clues to what made us human in the first place. How the ability to metabolize alcohol made us human Paleogenetecist Matthew Carrigan has an idea about how this happened . Arboreal species rely on fruit tha