Skip to main content

Is alcohol necessary for wine’s health benefits?

High on the list of controversies about wine and health is the alcohol question, one I get asked about every time I do a seminar on the subject. Why not grape juice, or for that matter wine's goodness in a pill?
New research from the University of Barcelona took the question head on and it's good news for wine drinkers.

There are so many thousands of papers on wine and health now that you can be forgiven for not keeping up (which I am taking care of for you here) but in order to understand the implications of this latest study we need a little background. For one, as I said in the book, wine is not just grape juice without the alcohol; the content of polyphenols antioxidants is much higher in wine for several reasons (for another, grape juice is high in sugar.) There is a great temptation to assume that we could just take the polyphenols from grapes and put them into supplement form, which indeed many have. For non drinkers and occasions where wine consumption is inappropriate, it may not be such a bad idea. But does alcohol make a positive, independent contribution to health?

In terms of cardiovascular health, it is known that alcohol in moderation improves the HDL/LDL cholesterol ratio, and it is tempting to assume that is the end of the story. But atherosclerosis is a much more complex phenomenon than simply sludged up pipes from a high fat diet. Chronic inflammation, at least as biologists use the term, is the important underlying factor. So the scientists in Spain designed a clever clinical study in which volunteers were assigned to three groups: one consumed a standardized amount of red wine daily, another an equivalent amount of de-alcoholized wine, and a third had gin, standardized to the same alcohol amount as the wine group, for 4 weeks. They then measured 25 separate inflammatory biomarker levels. These molecules go by an alphabet soup of names, but the implications of the study were clear: Both alcohol and red wine polyphenols independently improved (“down-regulated”) inflammatory marker levels, and though there was some overlap they generally worked differently.

So is alcohol an anti-inflammatory compound? At least where cardiovascular disease is concerned, it would appear so. That would explain why alcohol from any source appears to offer some benefit, though not as much as when it is in wine. Another important aspect of this study is that it is a randomized prospective clinical trial, meaning we can take very high-level confidence in the results. Not that I had any real doubts.

Comments

  1. Wow what a nice post.I am impressed at here.Can you more share for better ideas about this post.I will come back as soon.




    Thanks for more sharing....






    Laith Salma New York

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Which came first: Beer or wine? (or something else?)

Actually neither beer nor wine was the first fermented beverage, and wine arguably has a closer connection to health, but recent evidence indicates that humans developed the ability to metabolize alcohol long before we were even human. The uniquely human ability to handle alcohol comes from the digestive enzyme alcohol dehydrogenase, or ADH4. A new science called paleogenetics identifies the emergence of the modern version of the ADH4 gene in our ape ancestors some 10 million years ago. Interestingly, this corresponds to the time when our arboreal forebears transitioned to a nomadic lifestyle on the ground. We went from swinging from tree limbs to walking upright, and the rest is history. Understanding the circumstances that led to perpetuation of the ADH4 mutation may contain clues to what made us human in the first place. How the ability to metabolize alcohol made us human Paleogenetecist Matthew Carrigan has an idea about how this happened . Arboreal species rely on fruit tha

Why I am not surprised that the NIH cancelled the alcohol-health study

Not long after enrolling the first patients in the much hyped prospective study on alcohol and health, the National Institutes of Health recently announced that they were pulling the plug. I am actually more surprised that they ever got it off the ground in the first place. As I wrote a year ago when the study was still in its planning stages, there were too many competing interests, criticisms of the study design, and concerns about funding to expect that whatever results came out would be universally accepted. Nevertheless, I am disappointed. The study, called Moderate Alcohol and Cardiovascular Health Trial (MACH) was intended to provide hard evidence about the health effects of moderate alcohol consumption by prospectively assigning subjects with heart disease to one drink per day or not drinking, which they were to follow for up to 10 years. Most existing data on the question is retrospective, or simply tracks a subject population according to their drinking preferences, w